4 Quick Reasons Why You Should Hire A Mississauga Paralegal To Fight Your Traffic Tickets

If you have received a traffic ticket in Mississauga, there are actually two options to choose from. You can either plead guilty to the traffic charges or you could plead not guilty.If you plead “guilty”, you will have to pay the corresponding fine. Demerit points based on the unique Demerit Point System will be given as well. Of course, depending upon the case, the convicted individuals might be required to spend a few days in jail.On the other hand, if you are innocent, you could plead “not guilty”. After you plead “not guilty”, a trial date will be set. On that trial date, you and the ticketing officer will be required to attend.Even if you plead “guilty” or “not guilty”, you will need the help of a paralegal. A paralegal is a professional who has a huge knowledge about law. There are paralegals out there who are skilled in issues regarding traffic tickets. They often work in paralegal firms but there are also paralegals who work alone. Here are some reasons why you should hire a paralegal:??? A paralegal knows what needs to be done – Paralegals have a huge knowledge about the traffic law.

Therefore, their services will definitely be beneficial for you. Paralegals have a lot of knowledge regarding the regulations which you are facing. They could assess your situation and give you very useful legal advices. They can tell you what should be your next move.??? A paralegal can represent you at a trial – There are cases wherein the people who pleaded “not guilty” are unable to attend the court trial. If you have to be at a very important business meeting or you will be in another country at the appointed time of trial, a paralegal can attend it in your place. Your paralegal will definitely do a great job in defending your case.??? Paralegals charge less than lawyers – If you want to defend yourself from a traffic ticket charge, getting a lawyer might already be in your mind. However, it should be noted that lawyers really charge a lot. It is true that they are skilled when it comes to various legal matters. However, hiring them is not really that necessary since there are paralegals.

Paralegals might not have extensive knowledge as some lawyers but they have specializations and most paralegals are really skilled when it comes to traffic ticket issues. One can definitely save a lot by hiring a paralegal instead of a lawyer.??? There could be errors in the proceedings – There are times when errors are committed during the court proceedings. The poor victims who did not even stand a chance were forced to suffer the consequences. In order to avoid mistakes that could lead to the worst scenarios, you should definitely hire a paralegal. Paralegals will make sure that the law is followed and that no errors are committed.Actually, you can actually defend yourself if you have pleaded “not guilty”. However, the odds of winning your case will definitely be higher if you hire a paralegal. So if you find yourself being issued a traffic ticket, always consider hiring a paralegal.

Divorce and Children

If you and your ex-partner have children together, you must ensure you have made the necessary arrangements for their future care before you get divorced. If you fail to do so, the court will not issue a decree absolute. In this article we explore the different elements you will need to consider, including residence, contact and child maintenance. We also explain what to do if you are unable to reach these decisions of your own accord.Parenting agreements after divorce.When your marriage breaks down, it will undoubtedly be a difficult time for all the family, particularly for any children that are involved. To help reduce the stress and confusion young people often experience during a divorce, you need to make arrangements for their future domestic set-up as quickly and as painlessly as possible.

This will ensure a minimal amount of disruption to their lives.You and your ex-partner will, therefore, have to reach an agreement upon the following issues:-1. Residence: you must decide where your children are going live, and with which parent (who will then be known as the parent with residence). You may either agree that one parent should have sole residency, or you may believe shared residence is the best option, whereby a child lives with each parent for a specified amount of time.2. Contact: if there is just one parent with residence, you must decide when and how the other parent (known as the non-resident parent) can spend time with the children. For example, you may agree that the children will stay with their father every other weekend.3. Child maintenance: the non-resident parent is legally obliged to provide the resident parent with child maintenance. This is to contribute towards the costs of a child’s upkeep, and should be paid at regular intervals. Parents may negotiate a sum of child maintenance, or they may ask the Child Support Agency (CSA) to calculate an appropriate amount on their behalf.

What if you cannot agree upon childcare arrangements?If, however, you and your ex-partner are unable to reach a decision upon any of the above, you must take steps to resolve your dispute. The first thing to do is to ask a family lawyer about methods of dispute resolution. Processes such as mediation and collaborative family law are becoming increasingly popular ways to resolve family disputes, as it avoids the need for litigation and promotes an amicable relationship between parents.Nevertheless, alternative dispute resolution does not work for every family. If so, the last option available is to pursue action through the courts in the form of a residence order or a contact order (depending upon the nature of your grievance). If you wish to do so, you must ask a solicitor for further advice.

Identifying The Differences Between Preparing A Forensic Report For A Fraud And A Confiscation

Very often criminal cases need the expertise of a forensic accountant to assist. They analyse and present financial information in a way that a court can readily understand. Frequently their task is to assist the defence lawyers to respond to the allegations being made.The prosecution often brings a case in a fraud matter such as a tax fraud or a confiscation of assets using the Proceeds of Crime Act legislation following another conviction that involves a large amount of financial data. It is usual for the case summary, or statement of information as it may be called in a confiscation, to be written and presented by persons such as an accredited financial investigator. These are often employed as police officers and may receive training in a number of areas including investigating, interviewing and evidence handling. Some will receive rudimentary accounting instruction but most will not. It is very rare for the prosecution to employ expert accountants to present financial data owing to budgetary constraints. However, this results in the need for the criminal defence to examine the allegations in very great detail as, more often than not, they will include errors and inappropriate conclusions.In the case of a fraud, it will usually be clear that there is a case to answer. The police will investigate financial losses and in many cases be able to present a modus for the crime that can be readily understood. However, such is the partisan nature of the approach adopted by the regulatory authorities that they will often draw rather zealous or inappropriate conclusions from their evidence.

The forensic accountant must consider all aspects of the case and present the information in an independent and unbiased way. Sometimes this can result in the defendant being shown in a more adverse light, but mostly will lead to a tempering of the prosecution’s case.On the other hand the treatment of a confiscation by the authorities can result in the presentation of wholly unreasonable demands for a person to lose all their wealth and suffer lengthy additional prison terms for committing even modest crimes for which they have already received a punishment. The confiscation regime has often been called draconian and presents a much stronger need for a capable forensic accountant to become involved.The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 ensured that criminals involved in not only money laundering and drug dealing were targeted, but also any criminal who could be deemed to have enjoyed a criminal lifestyle. Unfortunately, the criterion for a criminal lifestyle are very easily met!The prosecution continue to use accredited financial investigators to estimate the extent of a person’s criminal lifestyle, without the benefit of having to prove matters to within “reasonable doubt” as is usual for criminal matters.

What is more, the legislation allows sweeping assumptions to be made, with the onus on the defendant to prove otherwise. This is why the defence is tasked with a difficult job and hence the need for the assistance of forensic accountants.An expert may therefore be used to clarify the framework of a complex fraud, presenting the evidence in an understandable fashion. It can point to flaws in the allegations being made but can equally present a poorer picture for the defendant. More often than not, in a confiscation matter the expert accountant will reduce the extent that the criminal benefit has been estimated as by the prosecution, pointing out flaws in the approach and mistakes in the calculations.In both frauds and confiscations there is a strong argument for an increased use of expert forensic accountants. This would mean increased funding for the police and prosecution authorities, but might mean a corresponding reduction in the amount of work that the defence is tasked with, which at the end of the day is also funded from public money.